How to Use Published Works Without Permission or Pay Royalties, Remuneration?

 

 According to regulation of current Law on intellectual property, copyright means rights of an organization or individual to works created or owned by such organization or individual. Copyright to a work includes moral rights and property rights. If other organization or individual wishes to exploit, use a part or the whole of works, they shall ask permission, pay the owner of copyright for royalties, remuneration according to both parties’ agreement or regulation of law. However, there are still cases of using works without having permission and/or without paying the author or owner of copyright for royalties, remuneration.

Cases of using published works without having permission, without paying for royalties, remuneration include:

-Making one copy for scientific research or personal teaching purposes.

-Reasonable quoting from a work in order to comment on or illustrate one's own works, without misrepresenting the author's views;

-Quoting from a work in order to write an article published in a newspaper or to use in periodical publications, in a radio or television broadcast or in a documentary, without misrepresenting the author's views;

-Quoting from a work in order to teach in school or university without misrepresenting the author's views and not for commercial purposes;

-Copying of a work in order to archive in library and research purposes;

-Performing a stage work or other art work in cultural meetings, communication or mobilization activities without collecting fees in any form;

-Directly audio-visual recording of a performance in order to report current news or to teach;

-Photographing or televising shaping work, architectural, photographic, or applied art work displayed at a public place in order to present images of such work;

-Translating a work into braille or other languages for the blind;

-Importing copies of another's work for personal use.

However, it should be noted that organization or individual using, exploiting works in above cases must meet the conditions: not causing damage to the normal exploit of works, not causing damage to copyright and owner of copyright; must provide information of  the author and the source and origin of the work. In addition, due to specific characteristics of of various types of works such as architectural works, shaping works and computer programs, cases of (i) making one copy for scientific research or personal teaching purposes and (ii) copying of a work in order to archive in library and research purposes, shall have permission and pay author or owner of copyright for royalties, remuneration according to both parties’ agreement or regulation of law.

Cases of using published works without having permission but paying for royalties, remuneration include:

-A broadcasting organization which uses a published work to make a broadcast which is sponsored, contains an advertisement or which collects fees in any form shall not be required to ask permission but must pay the owner of copyright for royalties or remuneration from using time. Level of royalties, remuneration or other material benefits and payment methods are agreed by parties; If the agreement can not be reached, it shall follow regulation of Government or shall file a petition to Court according to regulation of law;

-A broadcasting organization which uses a published work to make a broadcast which is not sponsored, no advertisement or which do not collect fees in any form shall not be required to ask permission but must pay the owner of copyright for royalties or remuneration from using time according to regulation Government;

Similarly, the use of a work in these two cases must neither affect the normal use of such works nor cause prejudice to the rights of the author or copyright holder, and must provide information being the author's name and the source and origin of the work. Besides, in case of using published work without having to seek permission but royalties or remuneration must be paid shall not be applied to cinematographic works.

If the client needs any other information, requires for further legal advice, or dispute with others on IP matters, our Vietnam IP attorney, copyright lawyers , we will be available for service.

Read More

What Rights Shareholder Holds in Joint Stock Company?

 

 Shareholders are individual or organization that owns at least one share of the joint-stock company and also are owner of the joint-stock company. Along with these roles, their interests are tied to business operations although they may not directly manage the day-to-day company affairs. In order to implement governance, the powers and responsibilities of each interest group such as shareholders, the board of directors, managerial personnel, etc. should be assigned based on the statutory principles and procedures.

According to the regulations on shareholders in the Law on Enterprise 2020, the rights of shareholders can be categorized into the following groups: economic rights, governance rights, information rights, and litigation rights.

Economic rights

Economic right is the right to gain all pecuniary interest with respect to the shares. The purpose of starting a business or investing in securities comes mainly from earning income or gaining profits. Economic rights accordingly include:

-Right to entitlement to dividends

-Right to transfer ownership

-Priority right to acquire the newly issued shares

-Right to entitlement to a portion of the assets after dissolution or bankrupt

-Appraisal Right

Among these above rights, right to entitlement to dividends and right to transfer ownership are the fundamental economic rights of a shareholder.

Dividend of common shares is determined according to the realized net profit and the dividend payment from the company’s retained earnings. Despite right to entitlement to dividends, shareholders are still subject to a number of limitations in law and in fact. Dividend entitlement is determined by the General Meeting of Shareholders based on the recommendation of the Board of Directors, after the company has fulfilled tax obligations and other financial obligations, contributed to reserve fund, paid for previous losses and met the solvency for all due debts and other property obligations. Dividend is not required to be distributed annually. Depending on the business situation, the General Meeting of Shareholders may decide to retain profits for reinvestment.

Besides dividend entitlement from the company’s operating results, shareholders can also gain profits by share transfer. This kind of investment is popular with respect of shares or securities of public companies, investors do not aim for corporate governance rights as well as dividend, they intend to earn benefits by the difference of the market values of stocks, especially when the stock value increases.

Governance rights

Modern corporate governance has two principles, one is to separate ownership and governance and to separate governance and management. It means that the major shareholders should not hold senior managerial positions in the company and Chairperson of the Board of Directors should not be assigned to other senior managerial positions such as General Director and/or Director.

Shareholders may be an individual or organization which they have their own different interests, goals and abilities. The separation between ownership and management makes the situation of whom the owner is and how the share get transferred not to affect the business operation. In the meantime, the separation helps gather professional managers to implement target intended by the company. According to the laws, members of the Board of Directors of a public company concurrently holding several executive titles must be reduced to the minimum to ensure the independence of the Board of Directors, specially the Chairperson of the Board of Directors shall not be the Director/General Director in a public company as of August 1^st, 2020. There are no similar rules applicable to joint stock companies which are not public company.

Attendance, speaking and voting at General Meeting of Shareholders are fundamental in governance right of common shareholders, applicable to all shareholders holding at least one share. ty. In principle, being a shareholder who holds shares of the company regardless of the number has equal rights to attend and vote at the General Meeting of Shareholders. By the General Meeting of Shareholders, the shareholders holding a certain number of shares can impact decisions on some matters such as election, dismissal, and removal of members of the Board of Directors and Controllers, amendment and supplementation of internal documents, major transactions, and others as stipulated in law on enterprise or charter. In addition to the above rights, the majority shareholders also have a number of other rights related to governance as follows:

The shareholder or group of shareholders holding at least 5% of the total number of common shares (charter may require a smaller percentage) is entitled to:

-Call a General Meeting of Shareholders

-Request Board of Controllers to inspect each specific matter relating to management, governance of company affairs if necessary

-Recommend matters to be included in agenda of General Meeting of Shareholders

-The shareholder or group of shareholders holding at least 10% of the total number of common shares (charter may require a smaller percentage) is entitled to nominate candidates for the Board of Directors, Board of Controllers

Information rights

Shareholders have the right to access documents and information of the company. In addition to the basic documents such as the charter, list of shareholders, meeting minutes and resolutions of the General Meeting of Shareholders, shareholders have the right to access to reports related to the business affairs.

However, some information is only reviewed by shareholders who own required percentage of share:

-Access and extract information on full name and contact address as specified in list of shareholders having voting right and list of shareholders having right to attend General Meeting of Shareholder; request to adjust his/her inaccurate information

-Access, extract and scan charter of company, meeting minutes of General Meeting of Shareholder and its resolution

-Access, extract and copy partial or whole list of involved persons and their contracts, transaction of which the company is other party, interests of Board of Directors, Controllers, Directors or General Directors and other managerial positions of company

-Access and extract minutes and resolutions of Board of Directors, annual or mid-year financial reports, reports of Board of Controllers, contracts and transaction approved by Board of Directors and other documents, excepting for documents related to company’s know-how and trade secrets (applicable to shareholder and group of shareholders who own at least 5% of total number of common shares, the charter may require a smaller percentage)

-Access profit and loss statements, finacial reports, governace and management assement reports; inspection reports of Board of Controllers (applicable to shareholder who own shares at least 1 consecutive year, the charter may require a smaller percentage)

Different to common joint stock company, a public company must annouce fully, accurately and promptly the periodic and extraordinary information on business, finance and governace. Other information must be annouced if it influences share price and investment decisions of shareholders and investors.

Litigation rights

The Law on Enterprises has provided a mechanism to request the Court or Arbitration to rescind the resolution of the General Meeting of Shareholders or sue the managerial personnels when they fail to fully and properly implement their tasks, including:

The shareholder or group of shareholders holding at least 5% of the total number of common shares (charter may require a smaller percentage) is entitled to:

-Request to rescind resolutions of the General Meeting of Shareholders when the orders and procedures of calling the meeting and making resolution of the General Meeting of Shareholders seriously violate the regulations of the Law on Enterprises and company’s charter

-However, the resolution of the General Meeting of Shareholders adopted by 100% of the total number of voting shares is legal and effective even when the orders and procedures of calling the meeting and adopting such resolution violates regulations of the Law on Enterprises and company’s charter.

-Request to rescind resolutions of the General Meeting of Shareholders when its provisions violates the laws or company’s charter

-The shareholder, group of shareholders holding at least 1% of the total number of common shares is entitled to:

-Sue members of Board of Directors, Directors, General Directors separately or jointly under certain circumstances

The Chairperson of Board of Directors or the Director or General Director usually acts as the legal representative of the company, representing the company to perform rights and obligations arising from the company’s transactions, representing the company to take proceedings before the court or arbitrator. However, when their interests conflict with those of the shareholders, shareholders have the right to initiate a lawsuit claiming benefits or compensation. The Law on Enterprise also permits shareholders to sue on behalf of the company when the above managerital personnels commit violations, causing damage directly to the company and indirectly to shareholders.

Not all shareholders have the right to sue for the above managerial personnels, only those who own at least 1% of the total number of common shares. This restriction makes sense with respect of public companies, in order to eliminate unfair competition actions conducted by minority shareholders who is controlled by the rival companies because amount of 1% in public company is not a small number.

Similar to a lawsuit against a manager, shareholder or group of shareholders is also required to own at least 5% of the total number of common shares to request rescission of the resolution of the General Meeting of Shareholders if there is violation on substantive law and procedural law. Accordingly, all resolutions of the General Meeting of Shareholders violating the substantive laws or the company’s charter are rescinded at the request of shareholders, but only serious procedural violations may be rescinded. There is no specific instructions for serious procedural violations at this time, the assessment will depend on personal perspective of the court and arbitrator.

Read More

Startup company

 

 From 2015 onwards, the wave of small and medium-sized startups in Vietnam has been developing rapidly. This development is followed by government’s support in forming legal corridors, scheme to favour startup ecosystem and encourage science and technology organizations, research institute, technology incubator, etc. To be deemed as a startup, an individual or business must start their own business along with an innovative idea. Currently, startup is the legal term as recognized under the laws, especially on Law on Small and Medium Enterprises Assistance 2017.

For clarification, small and medium startups are small and medium enterprise (“SME”) established to implement its business ideas based on the utilization of intellectual property, technology and new business models and are able to grow rapidly. These enterprises are in the stage of getting a business up and running, attaches to science and technology or find out new business models, provide products and services to new market segmentation, growth rapidly and make a difference to domestic and foreign enterprises.

Directive 9/CT-TTg dated on February 18^th, 2020 of the Prime Minister requires relevant ministries and agencies such as the Ministry of Planning and Investment, Science and Technology, etc. to implement solutions, remove barriers and resolve difficulties, issue policies to create favorable conditions for startups. These include the proposal to amend the Law on Investment in the direction of facilitating foreign investors to establish, contribute capital, purchase shares, or contributed capital of startup investment funds in Vietnam. Before establishing an economic organization, the foreign investor must have an investment project and carry out the procedures for issuance or amendment of the Investment Registration Certificate, except for the establishment of small and medium-sized startups and startup investment funds in accordance with the Law on Small and Medium Enterprises Assistance. Although the Law on Small and Medium Enterprises Assistance 2017 and guiding decrees have taken effect, it is not clear what procedures the foreign investors are required to do to set up a SME startup. It is necessary to wait for specific instructions for startup formation.

Moreover, according to the Law on Investment 2020, startup investment projects are included in the beneficiaries of investment incentives as recently added. Technology and intellectual property exploitation are two of subjects which are considered as startup projects. The technology sector, before the Law on Investment 2020 takes effect, has achieved a number of tax incentives for eligible enterprises, for example: enjoying enterprise income tax at rate of 10% for 15 year or tax exemption for four years, 50% reduction of taxable for the next nine years, not subject to value added tax. Furthermore, SME startups selected for SME support project are entitled to enjoy the following assistances: (i) consultation on intellectual property, intellectual property utilization and development; (ii) procedures for technical regulations and standards, quality measurement, testing and improvement of new products and business model; (iii) technology uses and transfers; (iv) training, information, trade promotion and commercialization; (v) use of technical facilities, incubators, and common working areas according to Decree No. 39/2018/ND-CP.

Read More

When a Contract is Invalid Due to Non-compliance with Form?

  Generally, contracts for sale and purchase of goods and service contract shall be expressed in verbal or written form or established with specific acts. For types of contract which must be made in writing provided by law, such contract must comply with such form regulation. Particularly, contract for international purchase and sale of goods shall be conducted on the basis of written contracts or other forms of equal legal validity.

There are two cases of non-compliance with form: (i) form of contract is not in accordance with the law and; (ii) contract violates against regulations on notarizing or authorization. It should be noted that the form of contract shall be the conditions for its effectiveness in cases where it is provided by law. The time limit of requiring the court to declare a contract of non-compliance with form invalid is 02 years, from the establishment date of contract. After such time limit, if there is still no request for declaring contract invalid, such contract still remains valid.

When the contract is invalid, the general rule is restoring everything to its original state and returning to each other what have received. The non-compliance with form contract could be valid de facto contract if recognized by the Court's decision when one party or the parties has fulfill at least two third of the obligation contract. Obligations means work whereby one or more entities must transfer objects, rights, pay money or provide valuable papers, perform or not perform certain work for the interests of one or more other entities. However, one party or the parties fulfilling at least two third of the obligation contract will not naturally make such contract valid unless there is decision of the the Court to recognize such. Specifically, according to request of one party, after fully considering conditions mentioned above, the Court shall make a decision on recognizing the validity of such contract.

It is important for parties to have a proper contract with terms and conditions that provide sufficient details with consideration of the nature of the business transactions and the possible resolution when potential disputes arise.  Further, the law governing the contract and the dispute resolution clause which refers to court or arbitration choice should be as clear as possible to avoid confusion and extended time resolving the arisen disputes.

Read More

Legal consequences of the trademark with origin in Vietnam and designation EU registered under Madrid system after Brexit

  After 47 years being a member of EU, UK officially left EU on January 31, 2020. This is an almost half of century relationship, thus, there would be a number of arising confusion as well as the issue which is in need of negotiation to complete the process including trademark registration with origin from Vietnam.

                    How To Protect Trademark in Vietnam?

UK is the member of Madrid system from Dec 1^st, 1995, concurrently, EU has also officially become a member of this system since Oct 1^st, 2004.  According to the international trademark searching Madrid Monitor, there are 292 Vietnamese trademarks registered internationally designated EU which include both the trademarks during the examination period and granted certificate.

How is the fate of these trademarks after Brexit?

According to the guidance from Intellectual Property Office of UK (“IPO”), the owner or applicant of the trademark which submitted according to the Madrid system and designated EU need to note the following points:

International trade mark registrations protected in the EU (“EUTM”) under the Madrid Protocol will no longer enjoy protection in the UK after 1 January 2021. According to Brexit Agreement, IPO will create a system: “comparable UK trademark” in relation to each international (EU) trade mark designation. In case EUTM are still in the examination period, the applicant has the right to register that exact trademark in UK in the transition period from January 1^st, 2021 to September 30^th, 2021. In details:

Firstly, to the trademarks which has been protected, UK will:

-Be recorded in UK registration system;

-The recorded trademark will have the same legal status as the trademark protected according to UK law;

-Keep the submitting of the application as EUTM;

-Keep the priority date according to the Madrid system or seniority date according to UK law;

-Be recognized as independently existing trademark according to UK law and may be challenged, assigned, licensed or renewed separately from the original international registration.

However, it is noted that: (i) the Comparable trademarks will be created at no cost to the holder of the international trademark, except a minimal administrative burden will be placed upon the rights holder (ii) the applicant will not receive the trademark certificate, however, they could be searched for the trademark at GOV.UK.

Secondly, for the EUTM which are still in examination phase:

In case EUTM are still in examination phase, on January 1^st, 2021, the applicant has the following rights:

-Apply the trademark application in UK for EUTM during the transition, nine months from January 1^st, 2021 until September 30^th, 2021 as mentioned above;

-Keep the earlier filing date as EUTM;

-Enjoy other international priority claim effecting on EUTM in accordance with the seniority claim according to UK law.

However, it is noted that when applying the EUTM during the examination phase according to the UK trademark system then:

-The trademark applied in UK must be the same with the trademark in EU application which submitted previously;

-Goods/services required to protect of the trademark must be the same or included in the scale of EUTM.

In case the application submitted into UK does not satisfy the above criteria, the application would not enjoy the priority date or the priority claim of EUTM.

The application after having been submitted within that period and satisfies the criteria will be deemed as UK application and be examined according to UK law.

Read More

Scope of Chapter 9 – Investment in CPTPP Agreement

  CPTPP is a new-generation FTA covering many aspects in addition to the traditional areas such as trade of goods, services. Non-traditional areas such as labor, environment, intellectual property, etc. all have significant commitments and are specified in each chapter. Enterprises of state member must meet certain conditions applicable to each area to enjoy respective benefits. As for foreign investment, the host country has the right to refuse to apply benefits to foreign investors or its investment if they do not meet the requirements of the CPTPP.

For avoidance of doubt, investment means every asset that an investor owns or controls, directly or indirectly, that has the characteristics of an investment, including such characteristics as the commitment of capital or other resources, the expectation of gain or profit, or the assumption of risk. Forms that an investment may take include: enterprise, forms of equity participation in an enterprise, debt instruments and loans, intellectual property rights, etc. Requirements for enjoying foreign investment benefits are provided indirectly in the way of permitting State Members deny of benefits under some circumstances as stipulated in Article 9.15:

“Article 9.15: Denial of Benefits

1.A Party may deny the benefits of this Chapter to an investor of another Party that is an enterprise of that other Party and to investments of that investor if the enterprise:

(a) is owned or controlled by a person of a non-Party or of the denying Party; and

(b) has no substantial business activities in the territory of any Party other than the denying Party.

2.A Party may deny the benefits of this Chapter to an investor of another Party that is an enterprise of that other Party and to investments of that investor if persons of a non-Party own or control the enterprise and the denying Party adopts or maintains measures with respect to the non-Party or a person of the non-Party that prohibit transactions with the enterprise or that would be violated or circumvented if the benefits of this Chapter were accorded to the enterprise or to its investments.”

Most commitments in the Investment Chapter apply to only investors and its investment that come from CPTPP Member States. However, Vietnam may deny the benefits to an investor of State Member that is an enterprise and to investments of that investor if the enterprise:

• is owned or controlled by an individual or enterprise of a Non- State Member.
• is owned or controlled by an individual or enterprise of Vietnam.
• has no substantial business activities in the territory of any State Member other than Vietnam.

By the above permitted denial, the CPTPP applies investment benefits selectively, restricts individual or enterprise of a Non-State Member to taking advantage of benefits from CPTPP. When performing investment licensing procedures in Vietnam, foreign enterprises that come from State Member must present internal documents indicating the owner or controller to demonstrate that their business is out of permitted denial. Besides, these investors must have substantial business activities in the territory of any State Member other than Vietnam. It is necessary to wait for more guidance from the competent state authorities on implementation of CPTPP.

The CPTPP Agreement restricts investment under its protection. CPTPP protects investment which is in its territory of an investor of CPTPP State Member in existence as of the date of entry into force of CPTPP for those State Members or established, acquired, or expanded thereafter. Therefore, the investments ended or terminated prior to the effective date of CPTPP in Vietnam and host country will not gain the benefits under CPTPP.

In the meantime, the investor could also challenge the denial decision of the host country through the dispute settlement mechanism between investor and state (ISDS).

Vietnam has ratified the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership – CPTPP on Jan 14th, 2019. This Agreement include 11 countries New Zealand, Canada, Japan, Mexico, Singapore, Brunei, Chile, Malaysia, Peru, Australia and Vietnam.

Read More

When Should the Employer Send Notice of Termination of Labour Contract to Employee Before Contract Expiration?

 

Expiration is one of the circumstances which permit termination of labor contract under the Labor Code 2012. Accordingly, the employer must inform in writing to the employee of the terminating date of labor contract at least 15 days prior to the expiration. Termination of labor relationship in each circumstance must follow different conditions and procedures to ensure the interests and obligations of both employee and employer and avoid potential labor disputes.

Previously, an administrative penalty was applied to violations of the labor contract termination notice mentioned above. If the employer fails to inform the employee, the employer will be subject to a warning or a fine with amount from VND 500,000 to VND 1,000,000. However, the Decree 28/2020/ND-CP issued on March 1^st, 2020 by the Government has repealed sanction for this behavior.

If the employee continues to work upon expiration of labor contract, both parties will be required to sign a new labor contract within the next 30 days, otherwise the signed contract will become an indefinite-term. Failure of the employer to inform the labor contract termination to the employee does not mean that the labor relationship is automatically extended after the expiration. If both parties fail to sign a new labor contract within the next 30 days, but the employee still do normal assigned job and is paid a full monthly salary, an indefinite-term labor contract is deemed as entered into by them. Any disputes arising out then will be settled based on provisions of indefinite term labor contract and laws.

The Labor Code 2019 repealed the employer’s informing responsibility upon expiration of labor contract except in a few circumstances such as the employee being sentenced to imprisonment, disciplined, expelled, ..., the employer is required to inform the employee in writing the termination of the labor contract.

Read More