Hanoi Convention on Cybercrime: 7 Realities on Geopolitics, Industry Opinions

  

Executive Summary

From October 25-26th, 2025, the Hanoi convention on cybercrime opens for signature in Hanoi, then remains open at UN Headquarters until  December 31st, 2026. Article 64 names Hanoi into the treaty’s opening clause creating an enduring visibility for Vietnam.

In here, we will discuss what the Hanoi convention on cybercrime does, why Hanoi is a neutral and practical venue, and opinions from industry.

In particular, no matter what, this signing event is a win for Vietnam which happens to be in the crossroad of big powers.  On the legal terms, there are some critics from stakeholders, that the languages used in the Hanoi convention appear to broaden the languages used in Budapest’s convention, which poses risks in several aspects.  One also should take note Vietnam did not sign the Budapest convention.  Cambodia did not sign the Budapest convention.  Some big powers did not.  

What the Convention Actually Does

The Hanoi convention on cybercrime establishes a common framework to address computer related offenses and to streamline cross border e-evidence. In short, it seeks to make cooperation faster and more predictable under the following areas.

Offenses: illegal access, illegal interception, data or system interference, computer-related fraud, child sexual exploitation materials, and misuse of devices, tools.

Procedural measures: expedited preservation orders, production, search, seizure of electronic evidence, real-time collection in defined scenarios, and subscriber information mechanisms.

International cooperation: 24/7 points of contact, mutual assistance, joint investigations, extradition options, and capacity building.

The Hanoi convention on cybercrime enters into force 90 days after the 40th ratification. Signature signals intent and ratification is what makes it binding. Until then, states and companies will continue to rely on the Budapest framework, mutual legal assistance in parallel.

Press Conference on the Signing of the Convention on Combating Cybercrime

Why Hanoi?

The text’s Article 64 specifies that the treaty opens for signature in Hanoi on October 25-26th, 2025 before moving to New York. That clause permanently associates the Hanoi convention on cybercrime with Vietnam’s capital.

Why Hanoi makes legal and practical sense

Neutral position: Hanoi sits between major blocs, offering a venue that many can accept.

ASEAN relevance: Southeast Asia is a dynamic digital market and a frequent target of cybercrime; hosting here matches need with visibility.

Operational readiness: Vietnam has the logistics to host and the incentive to modernize cooperation tools, making the Hanoi convention on cybercrime a credible platform for regional engagement.

Why Vietnam Surprises and is Still Logical

Vietnam has not typically been at the front of cross border cyber legal norm setting. The Hanoi convention on cybercrime puts Vietnam in a convening role, which fits today’s context that Vietnam is a neutral venue in a fast growing region that needs practical, lawful cooperation against cyber threats.

Parallel Tracks: Budapest vs the Hanoi Convention

The Hanoi convention on cybercrime may run alongside the Budapest Convention for some time. If some large economies delay or decline ratification, counsel should expect dual rails for cross-border e-evidence:

Budapest channel on one side;

Hanoi convention on cybercrime procedures on the other.

Industry Concerns and How to Address Them in Implementation

A balanced view of the Hanoi convention on cybercrime recognizes concerns voiced by technology companies and security practitioners:

Good-faith security testing: Broad drafting could chill vulnerability disclosure, bug bounty work, and penetration testing.

Compelled technical assistance: Providers seek clearer guardrails so that any request has a clear legal basis, specific scope, time bound limits, and where required, court oversight.

Transparency and auditability: Companies need predictable preservation steps, logs of handling, and confidentiality periods that align with law.

How About Dispute Settlement

The Hanoi convention on cybercrime follows the familiar, stepped model for interstate disagreements about interpretation or application:

Consultation and negotiation first;

Other peaceful means, which can naturally include mediation or conciliation;

Arbitration by agreement between the states concerned; and

If still unresolved, potential referral to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) under its Statute.

For commercial stakeholders, remember that most real world frictions are contractual agreement on cloud contract, data processing, incident timelines which are typically governed by international commercial arbitration under selected arbitration centers’ rules, with the agreement on law of seat and law of arbitration agreement. Building the appropriate arbitration clauses into contracts complements the state-to-state track of the Hanoi convention on cybercrime and keeps business disputes out of diplomatic channels.

Conclusion

The Hanoi convention on cybercrime places Vietnam in a practical convening role at a time when cross-border investigations need clear, lawful channels. Article 64 ensures the Hanoi opening is written into the treaty’s origin. The durable value for Vietnam and for companies will come from precise implementation: measured offense definitions, court-supervised procedures where required, predictable mutual assistance, and contract-level arbitration tools for operational disputes.

About ANT Lawyers, a Law Firm in Vietnam

We help clients overcome cultural barriers and achieve their strategic and financial outcomes, while ensuring the best interest rate protection, risk mitigation and regulatory compliance. ANT lawyers has lawyers in Ho Chi Minh city, Hanoi,  and Danang, and will help customers in doing business in Vietnam.

Source: https://antlawyers.vn/update/hanoi-convention-on-cybercrime.html

Read More

How to Answer AD23 Anti-Dumping Investigation Questionnaire: What Exporters Must Know Before November 5th, 2025

  

The Next Stage in Vietnam’s Tile Case

On September 29, 2025, the Trade Remedies Authority of Vietnam (TRAV) released the Vietnam AD23 anti-dumping investigation questionnaire to selected exporters. This marks the shift from the initial sampling stage to the full investigation stage in the tile case against India. The decisive deadline is clear, that all responses must be filed by November 5, 2025 (Hanoi time).

For sampled exporters, this questionnaire is the gateway to determining individual duty margins. For non-sampled exporters, the outcome depends on whether they requested separate treatment on time and how TRAV applies the law.

Current Status of the Investigation

August 18, 2025: MOIT initiated the anti-dumping case on Indian tiles

August 25, 2025: TRAV issued the sampling questionnaire

September 19, 2025: TRAV published the sampling results of the exporters to be reviewed.

September 29, 2025: TRAV distributed the Vietnam AD23 anti-dumping investigation questionnaire to these sampled exporters.

Who Must Respond and By When

Sampled exporters must submit full responses to the Vietnam AD23 anti-dumping investigation questionnaire by November 5, 2025.

Voluntary respondents who requested inclusion by September 27 are not guaranteed full questionnaires. TRAV has confirmed that no new exporters will be added at this stage.

Non-sampled but cooperative exporters will not receive the Vietnam AD23 anti-dumping investigation questionnaire but will instead be assigned a weighted-average duty margin based on sampled results.

Non-cooperative exporters will face the “all others” rate, often the highest duty applied.

How to Answer AD23 Anti-Dumping Investigation Questionnaire?

The questionnaire is a multi-part document requiring disclosure across operations, sales, and costs.

To answer the anti-dumping investigation questionnaire, pay attention to the key features that include:

Separate responses for each company: Every exporter and each affiliated company involved in producing or trading the investigated tiles must complete the questionnaire independently. If one company in a group fails to cooperate, TRAV can apply the dumping margin to the entire group.

Comprehensive sections, which is divided into major parts:

• General company information
• Data on the investigated goods and production
•  Export sales to Vietnam and other markets
• Domestic sales in India
• Cost of production
• Purchase and resale prices
• Computerized data files
• Reconciliation tables ensuring numbers tie to audited accounts

Trading company obligations: Non-affiliated trading houses exporting tiles to Vietnam must file their own responses and coordinate with manufacturers to complete the data.

Verification clause: Each company must sign a confirmation that information is accurate, with the understanding that TRAV will conduct on-site verification visits at offices and plants.

Translation and confidentiality: Submissions must be filed in Vietnamese, with both confidential and public versions, and the public version must contain summaries.

This structure makes clear why the Vietnam AD23 anti-dumping investigation questionnaire requires close cooperation between exporters, affiliated companies, trading houses, accountants, and legal counsels in Vietnam and India.

Step by Step Guide for Submission of Answers to AD23 Anti-dumping Investigation Questionnaire

Step by Step Guide for Submission of Answers to AD23 Anti-dumping Investigation Questionnaire

Steps to take to comply with the Vietnam AD23 anti-dumping investigation questionnaire:

Step 1: File responses through TRAV ONLINE.

Step 2: Submit a signed hard copy confirmation page and a USB with all files.

Step 3: Provide both confidential and public versions with meaningful summaries.

Step 4: Ensure Vietnamese translations are accurate and consistent.

What Happens Next

After November 5, TRAV will:

Review questionnaire responses for accuracy.

Conduct on-site verification visits at company offices and plants.

Issue a preliminary decision, possibly including provisional duties.

Conclude with a final decision within 12–18 months of initiation.

Handling the Vietnam AD23 anti-dumping investigation questionnaire is only the first step in a long process that requires sustained cooperation and expert guidance.

Key Q&A for Exporters

Can voluntary respondents still be added to the sampling list?

No. TRAV finalized the list on September 19. Companies that requested inclusion by September 27 but were not selected will not be issued the Vietnam AD23 anti-dumping investigation questionnaire.

If a voluntary respondent submits anyway, will TRAV accept it?

No. Only sampled exporters can file the Vietnam AD23 anti-dumping investigation questionnaire. Non-sampled exporters receive average duty rates instead.

What if a company filed the sampling form but does not submit the full questionnaire?

It will be treated as non-cooperative and assigned the “all others” duty, which is usually much higher.

What is in the full questionnaire?

The Vietnam AD23 anti-dumping investigation questionnaire covers export sales to Vietnam, domestic sales in India, cost of production, financials, and corporate structures.

How important are translations?

Essential. TRAV requires submissions in Vietnamese.

How long will the case last?

Between 12–18 months, including verification visits and determinations.

Why engage local counsel?

Local lawyers and consultants are vital to:

• Ensure proper translation of the Vietnam AD23 anti-dumping investigation questionnaire.
• Liaise with TRAV officers during verification.
• Prepare compliant public versions.
• Safeguard exporters’ rights over a lengthy process.

About ANT Lawyers, a Law Firm in Vietnam

We help clients overcome cultural barriers and achieve their strategic and financial outcomes, while ensuring the best interest rate protection, risk mitigation and regulatory compliance. ANT lawyers has lawyers in Ho Chi Minh city, Hanoi,  and Danang, and will help customers in doing business in Vietnam.

Source: https://antlawyers.vn/update/ad23-anti-dumping-investigation-questionnaire.html

Read More

7 Matters About Mediation Briefs: Understanding Their Role, History and How to Write?

  A Global Skill Arriving in Vietnam

“Mediation briefs” may sound unfamiliar to most future legal practitioners in Vietnam, but in the United States this term has become an essential part of professional mediation practice. It refers to a structured written document that helps both the mediator and the parties understand the facts, issues, and interests in dispute before the mediation session begins.

Through the initiative supported by the Weinstein International Foundation (WIF), the concept of mediation briefs is being introduced to Vietnam as part of the international mediation writing and advocacy competition.

Now we will together explore why it matters, and how it helps mediators, advocates, and disputing parties communicate more effectively.

Shadow a mediation case under Bruce Edwards

Where Mediation Briefs Come From

The concept of mediation briefs evolved alongside the professionalization of mediation in the United States during the late 20th century. As mediation developed into a mainstream alternative dispute resolution (ADR) method, professional mediators began requesting written summaries from parties to understand key issues in advance.

Esteemed mediators such as Judge Daniel Weinstein, a co-founder of JAMS, emphasized that effective mediation depends on discipline, preparation, and trust-building. A well prepared mediation brief embodies those principles by providing structure and clarity to the discussion.

Similarly, Bruce Edwards and Susan Edwards of Edwards Mediation Academy have explained that mediation briefs serve as a communication bridge between counsel, clients, and mediator.

Why Mediation Briefs Matter

A mediation brief is more than a summary, it is a tool for understanding. It allows the mediator to grasp the factual background, the commercial context, and the parties’ interests before they meet.

Good mediation briefs:

• save time by reducing repetition during sessions,
• help mediators focus on key issues, and
• improve mutual understanding by revealing what truly matters to each side.

In essence, mediation briefs make mediation faster, clearer, and more human.

Mediation Briefs Around the World

Although the name “mediation brief” is mainly used in the United States, similar documents exist globally:

In the United Kingdom, mediators use “mediation submissions” or “case summaries”

In Singapore, mediators receive “position statements”

In other countries, parties exchange “mediation statements”

Whatever the label, the purpose is identical, to prepare all participants for a constructive and informed conversation.

Who Writes a Mediation Brief and When

In professional practice, mediation briefs are typically drafted by the parties’ lawyers or mediation advocates.

The mediation brief should primarily address the mediator, not the opponent. It is not a legal argument, but an informative narrative.

Usually, mediation briefs are sent several days before the session, allowing mediators to study them carefully. Some mediators encourage exchange of briefs between parties, while others request a confidential version.

There are a shared brief, presenting key facts and desired outcomes; and a confidential brief, sharing candid thoughts or negotiation ranges only with the mediator.

What a Mediation Brief Should Cover

A professional mediation brief is concise, of length normally between 5 to 10 pages, and includes:

Case overview: what the dispute is about.

Background facts: key events, agreements, or obligations.

Issues in dispute: what remains unresolved.

Interests and priorities: what each party values most.

Previous negotiations: what has been offered or discussed.

Desired outcomes: possible settlement ideas.

Attachments: relevant documents or data.

As one said, a mediation brief should enlighten, not argue. It should show how the party’s position aligns with fairness and practicality, not just with law.

Mistakes to Avoid

There are times people misunderstand the purpose of mediation briefs. The errors include:

• Treating the brief like a court pleading or memorandum.
• Writing too long, too legalistic, or too emotional.
• Ignoring the mediator’s need for neutrality and balance.
• Failing to highlight underlying interests and human factors.

Remember that, a good mediation brief uses the tone of cooperative and credible, not combative nature.

AI and Mediation Briefs: The Intersection

In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) have started to influence how legal professionals draft documents.

According to JAMS’ 2024 article “Revolutionizing Resolution: The Transformative Impact of AI on ADR” AI tools are beginning to support mediators and lawyers in tasks such as summarization, preparation, and procedural coordination, but it cannot replace the human capacity for empathy and judgement.

The Benefits of Using AI in Mediation Briefs

AI can serve as a useful assistant when preparing mediation briefs for the purpose to:

• structure sections logically,
• improve clarity and tone, and
• summarize lengthy documents or correspondence.

When used responsibly, AI allows writers to focus more on the human and strategic aspects of the dispute.

What Are The Drawbacks of Using AI?

There are, however, important cautions:

Loss of critical thinking: Over reliance on AI may weaken a writer’s ability to analyze facts, prioritize arguments, and exercise professional judgment.

Perception and credibility risks: Mediators or judges may view AI generated documents as impersonal, overly generic, or lacking sincerity, especially in a field like mediation where tone and empathy matter most.

Best Practices in Using AI Wisely

Writers of mediation briefs should view AI as a supporting assistant, not a substitute for their own insight.

• Keep the strategic, emotional, and interest framing parts fully human.
• Rely on local knowledge, cultural nuance, and empathy, things AI cannot replicate.
• Always verify and correct any AI generated content for potential errors or bias.
• Ultimately, every writer must make their own choice whether to use AI, but if they do, it should remain an assistant, not an author.

Overall, mediation advocacy lawyers are encouraged to treat the mediation brief as an opportunity to demonstrate:

• clarity in explaining complex facts,
• balance in tone, and
• creativity in proposing settlement options.

Whether written entirely by hand or supported by AI tools, what matters is thoughtfulness, how the brief reflects understanding, empathy, and professionalism.

About VEMC, a Mediation Center in Vietnam

Vietnam Effective Commercial Mediation Center (VEMC) is a a Non-Profit Organization that Promote Mediation as Alternative Dispute Resolution in Vietnam, Provide Training and Mediate Disputes. The idea of mediation is to offer a different way of handling disagreements as compared to litigation proceedings. At VEMC, we pride ourselves on having a team of highly qualified and experienced professionals dedicated to the vision and mission of the center. Contact us to exchange ideas for cooperation in dispute resolution, work with us, or request services.

Source: https://vietnamadr.com/mediation-briefs-their-role-how-to-write/

Read More

From Theory to Reality: Learning the 6 Steps of Mediation Through Real Experience at JAMS

  

Why Real Experience Matters

In October 2023, I was fortunate to receive an opportunity from the Weinstein International Foundation to shadow some of the most respected mediators at JAMS in the United States. Over the course of several mediations, covering disputes from construction projects, shareholder disagreements, class action lawsuit, housing health issues, to insurance claims, I observed not just theory, but the living process of mediation in action.

Through these experiences, I learned that while every mediation is unique, most follow certain key steps of mediation.

In here, I will share these steps in simple terms, together with stories and impressions from my time in the US, so that future Vietnamese law practioners can imagine.

Step 1: Preparation, The Groundwork Before Meeting

Mediation does not start when the parties walk into the room. It begins before the session, with careful preparation:

• Mediators review the case documents.
• Lawyers (or parties) prepare mediation briefs.
• Scheduling, logistics, and sometimes pre-mediation calls are held to set expectations.

A very important tool in this stage is the mediation briefs. This is a written summary of each party’s case, usually provided to the mediator before the session. It explains the background, key facts, legal arguments, and the party’s goals.

In the US mediations I observed, briefs were concise but very informative, allowing the mediator to quickly understand the issues.

For example, in a construction project dispute involving delays caused by local government and contractors, both sides submitted mediation briefs in advance. By the time the parties arrived, the mediator already knew the financial and technical issues. This preparation allowed the session to move quickly into problem-solving.

Step 2: Opening, Setting the Stage

At the beginning, the mediator explains:

• The rules of the process (confidentiality, neutrality, voluntary nature).
• The goal: not to decide who is right or wrong, but to help parties reach agreement.

I saw this in a class action consumer rights lawsuit, where the mediator calmly explained the process to lawyers representing hundreds of consumers. By clarifying confidentiality and neutrality, the mediator reassured both the corporation and the consumer side that the process would be fair.

This opening stage is essential in the steps of mediation, as it sets the foundation for cooperation.

Step 3: Storytelling, Each Side Speaks

Each party has a chance to share their story. Sometimes this happens together in a joint session, sometimes separately.

In a housing dispute over mold affecting a family’s health, the tenant wanted to describe the serious health impacts on children, while the landlord focused on costs and repair difficulties. Allowing both sides to tell their stories not only provided information but also gave emotional weight to the dispute.

This step reminded me that one of the most human aspects of the steps of mediation is simply being heard.

Step 4: Exploration, Private Meetings in the Steps of Mediation

One of the most unique and powerful parts of the steps of mediation is the private meeting, or caucus. This usually happens after the joint session, when the mediator decides it is time to talk to each side separately.

• In the US, this often takes place in different rooms, with the mediator walking back and forth.
• In hybrid mediations, the mediator uses Zoom breakout rooms for privacy.
• These meetings can happen at any stage if emotions are too strong, or if sensitive information needs to be shared confidentially.

In one shareholder dispute, tempers arose during the joint session. The mediator quickly moved the parties into caucuses. In private, he was able to discover each side’s true concerns, such as recognition of contributions, that would never have surfaced in open discussion.

Private meetings showed me how much depth lies behind the steps of mediation.

Step 5: Negotiation, Building Bridges

The mediator then carries messages, proposals, and options back and forth between the parties. This is often the longest and hardest part.

In an insurance dispute between a hospital and an insurance company over unpaid claims, I observed the mediator skillfully reframe proposals. Instead of letting parties feel they were conceding, she emphasized progress toward a sustainable solution.

Negotiation is where the steps of mediation become most visible: moving from disagreement to agreement.

Step 6: Agreement, Writing It Down

When common ground is reached, the mediator helps draft a settlement agreement. This document is crucial, as it turns discussions into binding commitments.

In one hybrid mediation (mix of online and in-person), parties reached a last-minute deal after hours of negotiation. The mediator patiently stayed until both sides signed, even late after the normal work hours. That moment showed me how perseverance is key in real mediation.

The final stage in the steps of mediation proves that persistence and patience can transform conflict into resolution.

Lessons For Future Vietnamese Law Practioners

1. Mediation is not theory, it’s practical problem-solving.
2. Every case is different, but the steps of mediation give structure.
3. Listening is as important as arguing.
4. Preparation and patience are the invisible forces behind success.
5. Mediation briefs and private meetings are tools that make mediation work in practice.
6. Cultural sensitivity matters. In the US, I saw mediators adjust language, tone, and even room settings to make parties comfortable.

Shadowing mediators at JAMS gave me the chance to see how real disputes, real emotions, and real businesses are handled through mediation.

For future Vietnamese law practioners, I hope these simple steps and stories make the process clearer, and inspire you to see mediation not only as an academic subject, but as a powerful tool for resolving conflicts in practice.

The steps of mediation provide a roadmap. But as I saw in the US, the real skill of the mediator is in how they apply these steps to guide parties from conflict to cooperation.

One thing I keep in mind is great lunches, and snacks, coffee, energy/chocolate bars, fruits served all the time at JAMS center in San Francisco. Maybe this factor also plays part of the role in successful mediations.

And another thing one should keep in mind, mediation is not a solution to all disputes. It is one of 4 primary dispute resolution types, alongside negotiation, arbitration and litigation. But, why not give it a try?

About VEMC, a Mediation Center in Vietnam

Vietnam Effective Commercial Mediation Center (VEMC) is a a Non-Profit Organization that Promote Mediation as Alternative Dispute Resolution in Vietnam, Provide Training and Mediate Disputes. The idea of mediation is to offer a different way of handling disagreements as compared to litigation proceedings. At VEMC, we pride ourselves on having a team of highly qualified and experienced professionals dedicated to the vision and mission of the center. Contact us to exchange ideas for cooperation in dispute resolution, work with us, or request services.

Source: https://vietnamadr.com/learning-the-6-steps-of-mediation/

Read More

Why the 21st ICC Mediation Competition Is a Golden Opportunity for Vietnamese Students?

  

Introduction 

Imagine being in a room with the best student teams from around the world, negotiating real-life commercial disputes under the guidance of top international mediators. This is exactly what the ICC Mediation Competition offers.  

For Vietnamese students, this is not only a chance to showcase talent but also a bridge to global networks, practical skills, and professional growth.  

If you learn mediation today, you open the door to tomorrow’s opportunities, and the ICC Mediation Competition is one of the brightest gateways. 

Understanding the ICC Mediation Competition 

The ICC Mediation Competition is the world’s largest educational event devoted exclusively to international commercial mediation. Each year in Paris, student teams from leading universities compete in simulated disputes.  

They play the role of counsel and client, guided by professional mediators who act as judges. It is a vibrant forum where theory meets practice, and where participants sharpen their advocacy, teamwork, and problem-solving skills. 

Why the ICC Mediation Competition Matters for Vietnam 

For Vietnam, a country increasingly integrated into global trade and investment, the ability to resolve disputes through mediation is a vital skill.  

By joining the ICC Mediation Competition, which deadline to register is Oct 3rd, 2025  Vietnamese students can: 

• Build competence in negotiation and cross-border conflict resolution. 

• Gain exposure to diverse cultures and legal systems. 

• Bring home international best practices to enrich Vietnam’s ADR landscape. 

This competition helps prepare the next generation of lawyers and mediators who can confidently handle international disputes. 

But, this is not a free competition as international mediation writing competition in 2025 in Vietnam as organized by VEMC.   

Learning as a Team: More Than Winning 

The true value of the ICC Mediation Competition is not just in the trophies but in the journey. Forming a team, preparing case strategies, and practicing mediation advocacy are themselves powerful learning experiences. Vietnamese students will find that joining the competition allows them to grow together, share challenges, and discover new perspectives. Winning is rewarding, but learning as a team is priceless. 

Connecting With Global Experts 

One of the most exciting aspects of the ICC Mediation Competition is direct contact with world-class mediators, lawyers, and dispute resolution professionals. Students are mentored by seasoned experts who volunteer their time to coach, evaluate, and inspire. For Vietnamese participants, this is a rare opportunity to network internationally, build mentorship relationships, and explore career pathways beyond borders. 

A Call to Vietnamese Universities and Students 

Vietnamese law schools and student groups should view the ICC Mediation Competition as more than an event, it is a capacity-building tool.  

By encouraging participation, universities can elevate their students’ global exposure and practical readiness. Students themselves should see it as a launchpad: a chance to test their skills, make friends across continents, and return with a stronger sense of confidence in dispute resolution. 

Again, this is not a free event like IMWC25 organized by VEMC. 

Conclusion 

The ICC Mediation Competition is more than a competition.

If Vietnamese team could afford to join, that would be a great opportunities to learn, connect, and grow into the next generation of mediation leaders. By stepping onto this stage, you not only represent yourself and your university but also showcase Vietnam’s readiness to engage in the international ADR community.  

But more than that, following up with the global competition like this would be a good inspiration, and each of the Vietnamese could take step by step to start learning mediation advocacy skills today and be ready for opportunities arisen.

About VEMC, a Mediation Center in Vietnam

Vietnam Effective Commercial Mediation Center (VEMC) is a a Non-Profit Organization that Promote Mediation as Alternative Dispute Resolution in Vietnam, Provide Training and Mediate Disputes. The idea of mediation is to offer a different way of handling disagreements as compared to litigation proceedings. At VEMC, we pride ourselves on having a team of highly qualified and experienced professionals dedicated to the vision and mission of the center. Contact us to exchange ideas for cooperation in dispute resolution, work with us, or request services.

Source: https://vietnamadr.com/icc-mediation-competition-21st/

Read More