Extend the Response Time to Apply Anti-dumping Measures on H-shaped Steel Products From China

  On October 29th, 2021, Department of Trade Remedies issued the Investigation Questionnaire on the review and application of anti-dumping measures on H-shaped steel products originated from China for the relevant parties in the case ER01.AD03.

For facilitating conditions for relevant parties to fully cooperate in the case, the Investigating Authority extends the time to response the questionnaire for relevant parties. After the extension period, if the Investigating Authority does not receive timely responses from the relevant parties or the information provided is incorrect or incomplete, the Investigating Authority will use information and documents provided by related parties, the information and documents collected by the Investigating Authority or available information and documents for calculation and evaluation according to the regulation of Law on Foreign trade management.

The relevant parties must respond to the Investigation Authority before 17:00 December 20^th, 2021 (Hanoi time).

The information, data provided in the Questionnaire of the Investigation Authority and the right to access the information of the case during the investigating term will be implemented in the regulations of the laws.

If Client needs any more information or request for legal advice or potential dispute regarding trade remedies measures including, anti-dumping, countervailing duty and safeguard measures or international trade dispute matters, our competition, anti-dumping, and countervailing duty lawyers of International trade and tax practice at ANT Lawyers, a law firm in Vietnam always follow up anti-dumping cases and its development to update clients on regular basis.

Read More

Extension of Response for Cane Sugar Anti-Dumping Case

  Extension of Response for Foreign Manufacturers and Exporters and Domestic Manufacturers and Importers for Cane Sugar Anti-Dumping Case(Case No. AC02.AD13-AS01)

On September 21^st, 2021, the Ministry of Industry and Trade issued Decision No. 2171/QD-BCT on investigating the application of measures to prevent evasion of anti-dumping measures to a number of cane sugar products originating from Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia and Myanmar.

On October 25^th, 2021, Department of Trade Remedies (Investigating Agency) announced on the issuance of the Investigation Questionnaire for Foreign Manufacturers and Exporters and Domestic Manufacturers and Importers (Case No. AC02.AD13-AS01).

During the process of receiving the Investigation Questionnaire, the Investigating Authority received requests to extend the time for answering the Investigation Questionnaire from the relevant parties. Therefore, on November 23^rd, 2021, the Investigating Agency issued the announcement on agree to the extension. The Investigating Authority requires all relevant parties to cooperate and participate sufficiently during the investigation. The extent of the response will be the basis for the Investigating Authority to review and draw a conclusion of the investigation of this case. In the event that the Investigating Authority does not receive timely responses from relevant parties or the information provided is incorrect or incomplete, the Investigating Authority will use information and documents provided by related parties, the information and documents collected by the Investigating Authority or available information and documents for giving the result according to the regulation of Law on Foreign trade management.

The relevant parties must respond directly to Investigation Authority before 15:00 on December 16^th, 2021 (Hanoi time).

The information, data provided in the Questionnaire of the Investigation Authority and the right to access the information of the case during the investigating term will be implemented in the regulations of the laws.

If Client needs any more information or request for legal advice or potential dispute regarding trade remedies measures including, anti-dumping, countervailing duty and safeguard measures or international trade dispute matters, our competition, anti-dumping, and countervailing duty lawyers of International trade and tax practice at ANT Lawyers, a law firm in Vietnam always follow up anti-dumping cases and its development to update clients on regular basis.

Read More

How Foreigners Can Extend Visa in Vietnam During Covid-19?

  

Since the beginning of 2020, due to the impact of the Covid-19 epidemic, many foreign nationals entering Vietnam on a visa-free basis, entering with an e-visa or a tourist visa have been "stuck" in Viet Nam. In addition, Vietnam is restricting the issuance of new visas to foreign citizens to focus on the prevention of the Covid-19 epidemic, hence many foreign citizens in Vietnam cannot apply for a new visa, even though their visas have expired. Many foreigners have been concerning whether they can extend visa in Vietnam and seek help from immigration lawyers in Vietnam for such queries.

To ensure the legal residence of these foreign citizens during the time when the world is facing the Covid-19 epidemic, Vietnam has "automatically extended temporary residence" status for foreign citizens in the above categories from March 01^st, 2020 to the end of December 31, 2021. Foreign nationals who are automatically extended temporary residence do not need to apply for a new visa, however, they will renew their temporary residence every month to legally reside in Vietnam.

The automatic extension of temporary residence is also applied to cases of entry before March 01st, 2020 if they can be proven to be stranded due to the Covid-19 epidemic, certification of the Diplomatic missions by Diplomatic note (with Vietnamese translation) or a written certification from a Vietnamese competent authority about being isolated, treated for Covid-19 or other force majeure reasons.

In addition, to be automatically extended temporary residence, foreign citizens eligible for automatic extension of temporary residence must make temporary residence declaration and medical declaration according to regulations. In addition, foreign citizens need to comply with and not violate the law in Vietnam.

Automatic extension of temporary residence will help foreign citizens save time, cost, and travel restrictions during the outbreak of the pandemic as complex as it is today. However, the extended period of temporary residence is normally 30 days, hence the foreigners need to carry out the procedure to extend their temporary residence every month according to the notice of the Immigration Department.

In cases of extension of temporary residence, foreign citizens are allowed to temporarily reside in Vietnam for the permitted period and exit without declaration. After exiting the country, if they wish to return to Vietnam, foreign citizens must apply for a new visa in accordance with the law.

Read More

Plan to Simplify Regulations on Telecom, Gaming, Internet Service

  In the process of economic integration and development, in order to create favorable conditions for business and service sectors under the management of the Ministry of Information and Communications, Vietnam has approved the plan to reduce and simplify regulations a number of regulations under its control.

Accordingly, Decision No. 1994/QD-TTg agreed to reduce and simplify regulations related to business lines: Provision of pay radio and television services; Provide G1, G2, G3, G4 video games online; Newspapers; Telecommunications service business; publisher's activities; Business in printing services, except for packaging printing; Publishing services business; Postal services; Information Technology; Science and technology; Domain name registration and maintenance services; Internet; Network information security products and services in Vietnam.  It is important for the company operating in the areas of concern to consult with telecom, internet business, media lawyers to follow up with specific changes in law in Vietnam.

These are industries with fast-growing trends and have a strong impact on other industries as well as on the overall economic development. Therefore, the facilitation and restriction of procedures will contribute to attracting foreign investment and creating development motivation for businesses, quickly catching up with the rapid changes of services, improving the quality of services and improving the quality of services information and communication products.

Accordingly, on procedures for granting certificates of eligibility to provide public electronic game services, for the application components "Plan for the location of the computer room of the public video game service point suitable according to the prescribed area" and "Pay the fee for the issuance of the Certificate of eligibility to operate the point of supply providing public video game services" were abolished. Especially, it is subject to change immediately after the time of licensing. Therefore, the information of the location of the machine room option at the time of consideration for licensing is of little significance. Besides, the Decision also mentions supplementing the form of implementing administrative procedures on electronic means (changing the form of paper copies into electronic ones) to be flexible and ensure consistency with the Enterprise Law 2020 in the implementation for businesses.

The decision also abolishes administrative procedures for granting licenses to provide G1, G2, G3, G4 video game services online. According to the plan, many procedures with G1 online game service will be abolished such as: licensing procedures; license re-issuance; license renewal or procedures for amending and supplementing the license to provide G1 video game services on the internet... This is a meaningful abolition decision for the practice of licensing video games. Because, it is challenging for state agencies to request enterprises to apply for permits and report every time they change their business plans, affecting the autonomy of enterprises as well as creating huge inadequacies in terms of business administrative procedures.

In addition, business conditions: "The publisher's office has an appropriate area, meets the provisions of the law on standards and norms for using the office" has been simplified to " having an office that meets the provisions of law on standards and norms for using the office”. This change is reasonable, because the criterion of suitable area has no basis for explanation. Moreover, the area of ​​the publisher's headquarters is not related to the management of the State. With the new regulations, publishers can be autonomous in choosing the right area, ensuring space for business activities. At the same time, the Decision also combines two administrative procedures including re-issuance and renewal of licenses for printing and publishing publications into one administrative procedure, limiting cumbersome procedures, saving time and costs for businesses.

In addition, in the field of publication distribution service business, the Decision simplifies the process of granting certificates of registration for publishing and publishing electronic publications in the direction of only performing the verification process determining the project of publishing and distributing electronic publications. Therefore, if the project is eligible and accepted, the enterprise will be granted a certificate of operation registration immediately.

According to the simplified version of the Decision, the Postal Business Registration Certificate and the Postal Investment Certificate in Vietnam will be merged into the Business Registration Certificate.

Therefore, the introduction of Decision No. 1994/QD-TTg has reduced and simplified procedures; help the process of preparing documents quickly; save time for organizations and individuals when carrying out administrative procedures and minimize the cost of administrative compliance.

Read More

Public Hearing of Investigating and Applying Anti-Dumping Measures on Polyester Filament Yarn (AD10 case)

  On April 6 2020, Minister of Ministry of Trade and Industry signed the Decision 1079/QD-BCT in the case of investigating and applying anti-dumping measures on Polyester Filament Yarn originating in the People's Republic of China, the Republic of India, the Republic of Indonesia and Malaysia (AD10 case).

Pursuant to Article 70, Law on Foreign Trade Management 2017 and Article 13, Decree no. 10/2018/ND-CP stipulated the details of some articles of the Law on Foreign Trade Management on trade defense measures, the Investigation Authority is going to hold a public hearing for AD10 case.

Specifically, the hearing will take place online via Meeting room no. 904 – 23 Ngo Quyen, Hoan Kiem, Hanoi at 9am – 12pm, August 30^th, 2021, by Hanoi time. The spoken and written language used in the public hearing is Vietnamese. The related parties have the right to use other languages, however, translation from that language into Vietnamese is required. Information and documents other than Vietnamese provided by the related parties must be translated into Vietnamese. The related parties must ensure the truthfulness, accuracy and responsibility before the law for the translated content.

Deadline for submitting registration and consultation content will be before 5pm, August 23^rd, 2021 by Hanoi time.

If Client needs any more information or request for legal advice or potential dispute regarding trade remedies measures including, anti-dumping, countervailing duty and safeguard measures or international trade dispute matters, our competition, anti-dumping, and countervailing duty lawyers of International trade and tax practice at ANT Lawyers, a law firm in Vietnam always follow up anti-dumping cases and its development to update clients on regular basis.

Read More

What Bona Fide Possession of Property Are and How the Rights Are protected?

  Possession in good faith means the possession that the possessor has bases to believe that he/she has the right to the property in Vietnam under his/her possession. Bona fide possessor is protected by the law on property rights. Owning this type of property might be subject to many potential disputes which parties should consult with dispute lawyers from time to time to understand his/her rights to the property.

According to Clause 3 Article 184 of the 2015 Civil Code, a person possessing in good faith, continuously and overtly shall be eligible for prescriptive periods for enjoying the rights and enjoy the yield and income derived from the property as prescribed in this Code and relevant laws.

A person possessing in good faith is entitled to protect his/her rights and his right to possession when meeting specific conditions. Before a third person entered into a civil transaction, a prior civil transaction was established, the previous civil transactions were invalidated. Besides, the third person establishing civil transactions must be honest. Property traded in accordance with law and civil transactions must be compensated.

The owner has the right to reclaim the property from the rightful owner in accordance with Article 167 and Article 168 of the Civil Code 2015. Accordingly, depending on the type of property subject to ownership registration or not, the reclaim of ownership of the owner has a certain difference. Specifically, owners may reclaim movable property not subject to ownership right registration from bona fide possessors in cases where such bona fide possessors have acquired such property through unindemnifiable contracts with persons who have no right to dispose of the property; in case of indemnifiable contracts, the owners may reclaim the movable property if such movable property has been stolen, lost or other cases of possession against the owners' will.

Owners may reclaim their movable property subject to ownership right registration and immovable property, except for cases where a civil transaction is invalid but the transacted property is registered at a competent authority and such property has already been transferred to a bona fide third party through another transaction which is established according to that registration, such transaction shall remain valid.

In cases where the transacted property which is required to be registered has not registered at a competent authority, the transaction with the third party shall be invalid, except for cases the bona fide third party received such property through an auction or a transaction with an another party being the owner of such property pursuant to a judgment or decision of a competent authority but thereafter such person is not the owner of the property as a result of the judgment or decision being amended or annulled.

Read More

How to Prepare and Request for Imposition of Anti-dumping Measures in Vietnam?

  Organizations or individuals representing a domestic industry (Requesting Party) have the right to submit an application of request for imposition of anti-dump

The requesting party could themselves prepare or seek legal help from local international trade lawyers for representing and submitting an application of request for imposition of anti-dumping measures.

Following are

Stage 1: Preparation for the application

Application of request for imposition of anti-dumping measures (hereinafter referred to as “Application of request”) includes a written request for imposition of anti-dumping measures (hereinafter referred to as “Written request”) and related documents.

Stage 2: Submitting the application

The Requesting Party must submit one (01) copy of the Application of request to Dumping and Subsidy Investigation Division (hereinafter referred to as “Investigating Authority”) under Trade Remedies Authority of Vietnam, Ministry of Industry and Trade, which is located on 23 Ngo Quyen Street, Hoan Kiem District, Hanoi. The authority works during office hours from Monday to Friday.

In case of the Requesting Party asks to keep some information in the Application request confidential, Requesting Party must submit two (02) copies of the Application of request which comprise one (01) copy containing public information and one (01) copy containing confidential information. Regarding the confidential information, the Requesting Party must attach a detailed explanation of the request for confidentiality of the information and a summary of the contents of the confidential information that may be disclosed to other relevant parties.

The Investigating Authority shall verify the adequacy and validity of the Application of request and notify the result to the Requesting Party within 15 days from the receipt of the application.

Stage 3: Supplementing the application

In case of the Application of request is not adequate or valid, the Investigating Authority shall request supplementation from the Requesting Party. The time limit for supplementation of the application is decided by the investigating authority but not lower than 30 days from the notification of supplementation.

In case of the Application of request is adequate and valid, the Investigating Authority shall inform the related parties including the Requesting Party about receiving the application and start to verify the content of the Application of request. After this stage, the procedure for submitting an application of request for imposition of anti-dumping measures shall be completed.

In general, the information in the Application request should be adequate and valid. However, to pass the content verification and become a basis for issuing a decision to launch the investigation, the Requesting Party must satisfy the two (02) following conditions:

In terms of the condition of legal status, the Requesting Party must be eligible for the legal representative status of the domestic industry as prescribed in Art. 79(2) and Art. 87(2) of the Law on Foreign Trade Management (Art. 31(2)(a) Decree 10/2018/ND-CP). The Requesting Party shall be regarded as representing a domestic industry when all the following requirements are fully met:

i) The total volume or quantity of similar goods manufactured by the domestic manufacturers that submit the dossier and domestic manufacturers that support the request for application of anti-dumping measures is larger than the total volume or quantity of similar goods manufactured by the domestic manufacturers that oppose such request;

ii) The total volume or quantity of similar goods manufactured by the domestic manufacturers that submit the dossier and domestic manufacturers that support the request for application of anti-dumping measures accounts for at least 25% of the total volume or quantity of similar goods manufactured by the domestic industry concerned.

In terms of the condition of evidence, the Requesting Party should prepare sufficient documents on the dumping on goods imported to Vietnam to prove that the dumping of such goods significant damage, threat to cause significant damage to domestic industry or significant obstruction to the establishment of the domestic industry. The contents that need to be carefully and fully prepared are:

i) Information on the normal price and export price of the described goods in the Written request; dumping margin of the imports subject to investigation of anti-dumping measures;

ii) Information, data and evidences on significant damage, threat to cause significant damage to domestic industry or significant obstruction to the establishment of a domestic industry;

iii) Information, data and evidences on the causal relationship between the import of goods requested to investigate and the damage to domestic industry significant damage, threat to cause significant damage to domestic industry or significant obstruction to the establishment of a domestic industry.

International trade lawyers at law company will always follow up with authorities for legal update on matters relevant to international trade dispute and anti-dumping measures in Vietnam.

Read More